Knowledge vs Preaching
While reading one of Ray Whiting’s typically excellent posts to his My Life blog — about Joss Whedon‘s speech while receiving the Outstanding Lifetime Achievement Award in Cultural Humanism from Harvard University — a couple of Ray’s comments struck me as profound, and well worth sharing:
Only in humanity, and having faith in humanity, will we expand our potential to overcome the fear, the ignorance, and the hatred that is directly bred by religion. Belief in God leads to fear and ignorance and hatred, and it doesn’t matter which God you believe in. Every single religion that espouses a belief in a God automatically separates people into “Us” and “Them”. Religion instills a sense of “othering” that requires treating Others as outsiders, as enemies, and by its nature religion demands ignorance of Others — believers are required to be separate and not to mingle or know Others.
It’s important here that the term faith isn’t to be mistaken for worship. It refers instead to the focus, goals and what we strive for together as a species, the continuation of life. Remove all references to gods and supreme brings or forces, and consider for a moment that we need to stop looking at the past and unseen forces, and start doing what needs to be done to ensure that life not only continues but thrives.
If we continue allowing ourselves this indulgent, unsubstantiated fantasy of religion then we’re forever doomed to maintain this destructive tribal mentality, for the reasons mentioned in the quote above. And when those primitive-minded tribes have nuclear weapons little more than a button-press away, then it doesn’t take a genius to realise our days are numbered unless something changes. (In fact, the cynic in me wonders how the world made it through the previous 8 years of US government without ending up living the Fallout lifestyle).
Ray then ended the post with:
Would you like to know what I want to see? I’d like to see fact-checkers sitting in every church, recording the stuff preachers say, and then reporting on just how ill-informed, biased, and even downright deliberately deceptive some of those preachers are. That would be very cool.
How brilliant would that be? For people to catalogue the litany of garbage that flies from the mouths of these Protestant Popes, who continue to spout ignorance, lies and deceit in an assumed atmosphere of Parliamentary privilege, free from having to justify what they’re saying. Imagine that catalogue being checked and then shown to them by a reporter with a camera, asking them to explain all the mistakes which were supposed to be divinely inspired?
You don’t have to imagine too hard, as many of you may be aware that this just happened to Rick Warren (mega-church bible-thumper and speaker of the Presidential Inauguration Invocation). A quick Google search will return many proofs contradicting his current statements.
I’d go a step further than merely dreaming about monitors who hold such people responsible for their words. I’d love to see an Anonymous-type movement — but without the masks and rapidly growing internal troubles — with free Sunday mornings or evenings do just that: visit their local church, chat with those who greet them (after all they’re people just like you and me, but with an imaginary friend), and note what’s said. The preacher’s message may take the form of comparing a piece of news with what the Bible says about something (classic cherry-picking: anti-gay stuff will be from Leviticus, love will be from the gospels, science will be from Genesis, etc), it might be the preacher’s version of a news topic (same as an opinion piece in a newspaper, but without the press regulation and standards), and so on.
For those of you with Friday lunchtimes free, and assuming they’ll let you, you may care to visit your local mosque and observe jumuah, the early afternoon prayer followed by the khutba (the Muslim weekly equivalent of a sermon). Or the Jewish temple, Buddhist temple, and so on and so forth. All of the above welcome newcomers as potential converts.
However, if anyone does do this it’s important to keep your opinions to yourself. Don’t lie, but remember you’re in someone else’s domain and need to show the person respect, regardless of your opinion of their belief. The Golden Rule, people. Also make sure you’re dressed appropriately and that can include skin and hair being covered, depending upon the religion, local cultural mix, and level of fundamentalism — particularly if you’re female. Also be sure to let us know how it went.
I have done what I suggest above in depth, as I have blogged about previously, so from a position of experience I have to ask you: what’s the worst that could happen? At worst you’ll be turned away at the door, perhaps for no reason other than the colour of your skin, or perhaps rudely without reason; but at best you’ll have an insight into another religious culture. You’ll realise that those people also have concerns about many of the same things you do: job security, child’s education, grandmother’s illness, etc. I found it made a huge difference to my level of compassion for my fellow human.
After all, we’re all clinging to the same rock, trying to make it to the end of the day.
I’d quite strongly disagree with you regard buddhism, to the best of my knowledge it doesn’t actually do the ‘us’ and ‘them’ thing that most other belief systems do, neither does it have a belief in a ‘god’ at it’s core – its more about living well and respecting creation than a specific dogma.
Obviously there are different shades of buddhism, same as with all religions, but I personally find it very hard to find anything in buddhist doctrines that could or would cause war and strife to the extent the other particpants in the fantasy friend game do
There are numerous types of Buddhism, as I’ve blogged about here in the past, and there are indeed deistic and divisive versions or sects. And as with many other formerly peaceful religions, there are also growing numbers of violent, fundamentalist sects. However, the teachings of Theravada, with which I’m most familiar, go so far as to say that no position, belief or opinion is important enough that it can’t be relinquished — including belief in Buddhism itself. That’s the ultimate middle way approach, and is an attribute I can’t help but admire, even if it is unrealistic. (After all, if we all agree to give up our guns, missiles, nuclear bombs, etc, we’ll all live happily in peace, right…?) Just ask the Buddhists of Tibet and their exiled leader.
But contrast this monastic ideal to the actual events that have been going on in countries like Thailand and Sri Lanka. There is the written word of a religion, its intent, and then there’s how it’s both practised and the differences between the sects. Just as people judge from the outside all atheists based upon the intolerant behaviour of a few strong atheists, likewise the same is true when looking at religions. That is, it might be true for only some but it’s still a generalisation from someone on the outside looking in.
I’ve tried to avoid unwarranted generalisations — it’s part of why I’ve looked into religions in the way that I have — but I have seen this behaviour in Buddhism, too. It doesn’t necessarily matter what the doctrine and texts say, as I’m sure anyone who’s compared a Christian fundamentalist’s opposed views on homosexuality versus travel/work on Sunday (both covered in the same Biblical book, with similar punishments) will attest.
And all that has ignored Buddhist doctrines on topics such as euthanasia where one must suffer a lifetime of agony if that’s what the cards have dealt you, or a dog run over by a car must not be put out of its misery even if the vet can do nothing, and so on. Again, this doesn’t apply to all Buddhists, but is a doctrine I’ve heard espoused by a number of Buddhist monks and leaders.
I’m not trying to paint any religion as more or less evil as another, but I do hold my position that the fantasy friend game is inherently harmful as encourages the offloading of responsibility and reasoning to the voice inside our head. And, for some, that voice is madder than a hatter.
You mean this book? Thanks for the recommendation: what’s notable about it?
The Golden Rule…do unto others…lol.
I want to be thrown to The Great Crocodile God ! Do unto others…
Do what you will – live with the consequences
My favourite Buddhist saying: If you meet Buddha along the Way – kill him.
Oh – read Siddhartha by Herman Hesse…
In my years of agnosticism and/or apathy I always rather liked the notion of “you get what you believe when you die” (Therefore, I believe I’m surrounded by willing, nubile young ladies and that I never get tired… *ahem* Focus!) — providing you’re of sound mind and aren’t too masochistic — but unfortunately what sounds nice (or horrible) doesn’t make it so.
Offler! I’m ashamed to say I didn’t get the Pratchett reference when Dex mentioned him. Not much of Discworld acolyte, am I?
I’m actually reading If you meet Buddha on the road – kill him as one of my set texts, will let you know how I get on with it
As everyone knows (if they read TP) what you believe is what happens to you when you’re dead.
So Offler is waiting for Dex….and he has sharpened his teef